Tokyo Disney Auditions Face

WORKSHOP ON MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION ESTÁNDARESLICENCIADO: Edilberto NOVOAUNIVERSIDAD
NATIONAL DATE: 7,8 AND 9 SEPTEMBER 2009LUGAR CONVENIOSSAN CENTER Jose del Guaviare ATTENDEES: TEACHERS, DIRECTORS, TEACHERS SEE LISTINGS

APERTURE WORKSHOP LIC.JULIO CESAR ARIAS AREA OF QUALITY COORDINATOR
Hello fellow workshop we will develop for 3 days there are a number of outstanding commitments previously acquired, the success of the workshop depends on the work they have developed all educational institutions. commitment is to reach some tangible products such as educational evaluation model and the curriculum structure with the university believe that we Regarding the process of teacher education are otherwise Edilberto communications via email that you intended to make things occur in reality and these are the places to interact and generate the possible explanations generate discussion. Welcome.


THE AGENDA AND WORKING METHODOLOGY EDILBERTO NOVOA GRADUATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE University

Good morning, In the last opportunity left with certain agreements to advance the proposal built around the concept of curricular and institutional system of the last assessment day appointed a commission to move forward on creating a system of evaluation that allow the student to the transition from institution to institution in those commitments perspective today is to leave the structure of the assessment mounted
some documents were left for the characterization of the institution where we are and where we go a number of tools with a user manual to determine where send questions to think about the subject curriculum to create the institutional system of evaluation. On the scale identifies four performances the basic, high, higher, basic where all students can be promoted.
The intention is to leave this structure and products designed and allow themselves to school and taking into account their specificities.
These three days

WE DO THE FOLLOWING: I left
wealth of information and everything worked as we have reversed. To do this I hope that schools have the information to see that we are closing element and element are the ones we straighten. This is the first Tuesday
institutional assessment will look at Wednesday
curricular structure. Tomorrow
urban or 3 people come CON2 academic advising.
We have to do the exercise here teachers of math, science language, with representatives from each area principals and coordinators to make this construction we think each area is curriculum from kindergarten up to eleven.
Standards
one hand he wants the Ministry of National Education MEN

"EDUCATION IN THE TERRITORIES OF THE BORDER" PRESENTATION




The second working session was held with management educators (principals, coordinators and rural principals ) between 20 and 22 May 2009, at the Convention Center of San Jose del Guaviare. At the close of the meeting raised the following recommendations as a task for schools:

§ Strengthen the management teams of the schools with the aim of coordinating the characterization of the students and the institution itself relevant to the proposed curriculum and assessment of learning, with a view to developing the institutional system for evaluation.

§ Perform diagnostic evaluation from the characterization in order to make the curriculum more relevant, defining the minimum learning by area and grade level to develop the institutional system of evaluation. §

propose strategic actions in order to level the students agree with the analysis results below the expected learning expectations in the department, via the definition of the sector plan for improving the quality of education. In view

to give continuity to advance is required to follow up the agreements made, to make adjustments and redirect processes in order to consolidate the proposals for curriculum reorganization and consolidation of Institutional Assessment System.

It takes as reference the set of recommendations and the creation of management teams, which are the basis of work to develop accompanying measures in this third phase. OBJECTIVES



• Consolidate a proposal to organize curricular areas and fields of knowledge from their potential and lay the foundation for evaluation and monitoring.

· Provide support for building the institutional system of evaluation in accordance with Decree 1290 of 2009.



METHODOLOGY In order to develop the proposed objectives for the third phase of training and support, the package of recommendations as a management task for teachers in the municipality has been advanced in part (instrument making, information gathering and systematization information) are assumed in the analysis.

From this starting point, this phase would follow two strategies: in the morning will be held on-site visit and work with the management team and academic councils, with the intention of achieving the first objective. In the afternoon we will work in place that has provided quality equipment to the Ministry of Education teachers with management to achieve the second objective.

This phase is characterized by a very practical work, taking as reference the themes addressed in the second phase, which gave the work items to advance the re conceptualization of PEI and Institutional Building Rating System.

ROAD WORK


1. CURRICULUM REORGANIZATION

In working with the Academic Councils and Teams Management will split the collection of information from each school and from the analysis to meet the interests, needs and expectations of students, as reference in curriculum construction. The curricula for each school will be reviewed against the guidelines and curriculum standards to determine how close or far we expected from the education system. It is up to each school and find the foundations on which curriculum development conducted in each of the areas or fields of knowledge.

2. INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION

From Decree 1290 of 2009, will define the conditions for the construction of Institutional Assessment System and meetings with teachers managers advance in building common consensus guidelines for the basic agreements that will govern the schools and the strategy for communicating to the school community and its adoption in the operating coexistence and PEI.

In this case the in-situ work with the Academic Councils will provide the elements to draw the boundaries for each grade, with a view to avoid the use of evaluation as an instrument of power, to be used in a punitive, not as a pedagogical tool that contributes to the improvement of the practices of teachers and children and young people to learn more and better.




EDILBERTO
NOVOA CC CAMARGO No. 19439973